top of page

Defensive Routine Archetypes: Five Patterns That Block Organizational Learning


Every organization has patterns that look productive on the surface but quietly undermine its ability to learn and adapt. Chris Argyris called these defensive routines: habitual behaviors people enact to protect themselves from embarrassment or threat*. They feel normal. They often feel necessary. And they are almost always invisible to the people enacting them.


What makes defensive routines so damaging is not their mere existence, but their self-preserving nature. The very behaviors that block learning also prevent examination of those behaviors. Over time, these patterns become so embedded that they feel like "just how things work around here."


Understanding the common archetypes can help you see these routines when they show up.


The "Here We Go Again" Loop


This is the pattern of predictable interpersonal escalation. A problem surfaces. One person responds defensively. The other anticipates this and reacts in kind. Neither side engages in genuine inquiry because both are too busy protecting themselves from perceived threat.


What emerges are open secrets. Everyone knows the issues exist. No one is willing to address them directly. The loop repeats because neither party examines their own contribution to the dynamic.


Mixed Messages and Bypassing

This archetype shows up in teams and meetings constantly. Someone sends an ambiguous communication to avoid conflict. A difficult topic gets tabled with a promise to "circle back later." People assume others understood what they meant without checking.


These behaviors maintain surface calm while ensuring that real issues remain unresolved. The undiscussable becomes undiscussable, as Argyris put it. Everyone senses the tension. No one names it.


Self-Censoring and Protective Support


Self-censoring happens when people withhold feedback, dissent, or concerns. Protective support happens when managers or peers shelter someone from uncomfortable realities by filtering bad news or softening facts.


Both behaviors begin with good intentions. Both end up suppressing vital information. What starts as care becomes collusion. The organization maintains an illusion of harmony while real problems stay hidden.


Fancy Footwork


In this archetype, activity substitutes for genuine problem-solving. Teams produce elaborate reports that avoid the actual issue. Meetings fill with jargon and ritual. Solutions get implemented without anyone confronting the underlying challenge.


This is anti-learning behavior. It creates movement and the appearance of progress without any real insight or change. (Chris Argyris' work tends to use this term more broadly, while mine & others' interpretation leans more towards the Heifetz, et al. definition "work avoidance": displacement and diversion.).


The Unilateral Control Model


This pattern underlies many of the others. It operates on a simple assumption: I am right, you are wrong, and my job is to maintain control. When this model governs interactions, dissent becomes threat, vulnerability becomes weakness, and defensive routines emerge automatically.


Why This Matters


Defensive routines do not come from bad intentions. They are natural human responses to perceived threat. But left unexamined, they become systemic barriers to learning, innovation, and change.


The first step is simply noticing when these patterns are operating. The second is creating conditions where people feel safe enough to surface what is usually left unsaid. Neither step is easy. But both are necessary if you want an organization capable of adapting to complex challenges. *The archetypes described here draw primarily from the organizational learning work of Chris Argyris and colleagues on defensive routines, Model I and Model II theories-in-use, and self-sealing behavior (Argyris, 1982; Argyris, 1990; Argyris & Schön, 1996), as well as applied interpretations in The Systems Thinker. The archetypal framing is an integrative synthesis intended to make these recurring patterns more visible and usable in practice.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page